Inclusive Corporate Social Responsibility
Empowering Persons with Disabilities in the Workplace
Keywords:
Disability, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Inclusive Employment, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Workplace Accommodations, Equal OpportunitiesAbstract
The integration of persons with disabilities into the workforce represents a critical facet of corporate social responsibility (CSR), reflecting a commitment to fostering diversity and equity within organizational structures. This research paper investigates the dynamic relationship between disability and CSR, aiming to examine the challenges, benefits, and strategies crucial in cultivating an inclusive environment within corporate settings. By exploring the role of businesses in advocating equal opportunities, accommodations, and support for individuals with disabilities, this study seeks to underscore the significance of creating a more inclusive and socially responsible corporate landscape. The paper begins by establishing the contextual background of disability and its intersection with CSR, highlighting the importance of inclusive employment practices within organizations. It delves into the existing legal frameworks and obligations, delineating current trends and initiatives in the realm of CSR and disability inclusion. Furthermore, the research unpacks the myriad benefits that arise from integrating persons with disabilities into the workforce, emphasizing economic, social, and innovative advantages for businesses. In exploring these benefits, the paper addresses the challenges hindering the implementation of inclusive practices, such as attitudinal barriers, accessibility issues, and the need for heightened awareness and training. The core of the paper lies in detailing best practices and strategies for fostering inclusive employment, spanning recruitment processes, workplace accommodations, and comprehensive training programs for both employees and management. Additionally, the paper showcases case studies and exemplary models of successful CSR initiatives that focus on disability inclusion, illuminating companies at the forefront of implementing inclusive employment practices. Finally, the study underscores the critical role of CSR in influencing future policies and practices, advocating for policy changes, and highlighting the evolving nature of CSR in enhancing disability inclusion. Through an extensive analysis of scholarly articles, reports, and corporate practices, this paper endeavors to offer a comprehensive understanding of how businesses can bolster their CSR strategies by promoting inclusive workplaces that accommodate individuals with disabilities, thereby contributing to a more socially responsible and diverse business environment.
Downloads
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Arena, M., Azzone, G., Bengo, I., & Sicca, L. (2016). Inter-Organizational Partnerships for CSR: Literature Review and Propositions for Future Research. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(5), 272-285.
Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business Sustainability: It Is about Time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70-78.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Field, M. J. (2003). The Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children. National Academies Press.
Bell, M. P., Mason, J., & O’Connor, M. (2017). A Behavioral Ethics Approach to the Impact of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality on Subordinate Whistle-Blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4), 869–885.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
Gallagher, D. G., & Doherty, R. (2009). Developing CSR Giving and Social Partnership Practices: A Case Study in the Irish Financial Services Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 169-186.
Greenwood, M. (2002). Ethical Decision Making in Managerial Behavior: A Dual-Process Conceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 578–591.
Jackson, S. E., & Ruderman, M. (1999). Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace. American Psychologist, 54(1), 17-30.
Jamali, D., & Neville, B. (2011). Convergence Versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-Layered Institutional Lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 599-621.
Jones, D. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2017). Social Responsibility in and of Organizations: The Psychology of Corporate Social Responsibility among Organizational Members. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 293-312). Oxford University Press.
Konrad, A. M., Moore, M. E., Ng, E. S., & Doherty, A. J. (2018). Do We Really Need More Data? A Response to Aguinis, Villamor, and Pierce. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2411–2437.
Kulkarni, M., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Zaniboni, S. (2008). Looking Beyond Disadvantage: Cultural Capital, Positive Deviance, and Pro-Active Agency Among Black and Ethnic Minority Students in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(11), 2030-2048.
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.
O’Brien, K. R., & Royal, M. (2009). Employee Awareness and Attitudes to Change Following a Merger: A Tale of Two Countries. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(7), 1517–1543.
Waddock, S., & Bodwell, C. (2004). Managing Responsibility: What Can Be Learned from the Quality Movement? California Management Review, 47(1), 25-37.
Waldman, D. A., de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N., House, R. J., Adetoun, B., Barrasa, A., et al. (2006). Cultural and Leadership Predictors of Corporate Social Responsibility Values of Top Management: A GLOBE Study of 15 Countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823–837.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Annapurna Gupta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
